Citizen bodies: is embodied citizenship a contradiction in terms?
Date
2002
Authors
Bacchi, C.
Beasley, C.
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Journal article
Citation
Critical Social Policy, 2002; 22(2):324-352
Statement of Responsibility
Carol Lee Bacchi and Chris Beasley
Conference Name
Abstract
In this article, we draw connections between notions of embodiment and conceptions of citizenship to provide insights into contemporary debates about desirable modes of governance. We suggest that there is a need to challenge the instrumental conception of bodies which informs much public policy (our examples are New Reproductive Technologies and cosmetic surgery in Australia), and which underlies much citizenship theory, both feminist and mainstream. We identify a demarcation in our selected policies between those presumed to have control over their bodies and those presumed to be controlled by their bodies. The former are designated 'autonomous citizens' (with autonomous meaning distance from government oversight), while the latter are constituted as lesser citizens in need of forms of control. Women appear on both sides of the dichotomy, but in ways which leave them invisible as political subjects. We coin the term 'social flesh' to capture a vision of interacting, material, embodied subjects and initiate consideration of the forms of governance that might be appropriate for embodied citizens.
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Copyright © 2002 Critical Social Policy