How veridical are different modalities of digital representation?: The effect of presentation modality on physiological response
Files
(Published version)
Date
2016
Authors
Gero, J.S.
Shields, J.
Yu, R.
Editors
Chien, S.
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Conference paper
Citation
Living Systems and Micro-Utopias: Towards Continuous Designing, Proceedings of the 21st International Conference of the Association for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia CAADRIA 2016, 2016 / Chien, S. (ed./s), pp.861-870
Statement of Responsibility
Conference Name
Living Systems and Micro-Utopias: Towards Continuous Designing, Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA 2016) pp. 861-870 (30 Mar 2016 - 2 Apr 2016 : Melbourne, Australia)
Abstract
This paper presents the methodology and results of a pilot study comparing the eye movements of architecture students when looking at different modalities of digital spatial representation. The two participant groups consisted of third and fourth year undergraduate architecture students from the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, USA and from Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin,China. The two modalities studied were a computer-generated line drawn perspective and a digitized photograph of the same architectural space. The results of this study show that student designers’ physiological response varies with different representation modalities
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Access Status
Rights
Copyright 2016 The Association for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA)