The International Criminal Court, human rights and intervention narratives
Date
2017
Authors
Chazal, N.
Editors
Weber, L.
Fishwick, E.
Marmo, M.
Fishwick, E.
Marmo, M.
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Book chapter
Citation
Source details - Title: The Routledge international handbook of criminology and human rights, 2017 / Weber, L., Fishwick, E., Marmo, M. (ed./s), pp.491-500
Statement of Responsibility
Conference Name
Abstract
This chapter explores how the International Criminal Court (herein, the ICC or Court) is constructed as the judicial arm of humanitarian intervention measures and the enforcer of human rights on a global scale. The ICC’s narratives of prevention, which are used as justification for judicial intervention, significantly extend and buttress human rights discourses making them an even more prominent part of international relations and the structure of international society. Discourses of preventing human rights abuses through the threat of judicial investigation, prosecution and punishment fuse human rights to processes of criminalization as human rights abusers are labelled as criminal and pursued via an international criminal justice process. Through this process of criminalization and labelling the ICC legitimates other, more ‘muscular’ (Orford 1999) forms of intervention, such as military intervention.
This chapter explores how criminal justice investigations and prosecutions conducted by the ICC are operationalized alongside military interventions using the case study of Libya. This international militarization of justice (Degenhardt 2015) is problematic as powerful countries and entities can construct themselves as heroes (Orford 1999) or saviours (Mutua 2001) who intervene in conflicts under the guise of protecting human rights, while being driven by less altruistic motives such as realpolitik and geopolitics.
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Access Status
Rights
Copyright 2017 Leanne Weber, Elaine Fishwick and Marinella Marmo