Changes to the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefit Scheme restrictions for biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs have influenced the use of leflunomide
| dc.contributor.author | Hopkins, A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Vitry, A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | O'Doherty, C. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Proudman, S. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wiese, M. | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Introduction Methotrexate is the ‘anchor’ of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment and leflunomide is commonly added in resistant disease, or where methotrexate is contraindicated.[1] In Australia, biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) are considered when response to conventional DMARD therapy is inadequate.[1, 2] They are expensive and criteria have been developed to restrict their use on the Australian Commonwealth Government subsidised Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). Prior to 2010, to qualify for bDMARDs, a patient must have been treated for at least 12 weeks with: (i) weekly methotrexate; (ii) combination therapy with methotrexate and at least two other DMARDs; and (iii) received treatment with leflunomide or cyclosporine.[2] In August 2010, these restrictions were modified so they could be accessed by patients who failed to respond to 6 months of therapy, which must include at least 3 months of methotrexate (unless contraindicated) and 3 months of hydroxychloroquine, leflunomide or sulfasalazine.[2] We aimed to assess the influence of these changes on the use and expenditure on leflunomide and bDMARDs. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases, 2017; 20(11):1795-1797 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/1756-185X.12717 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1756-1841 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1756-185X | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | Proudman, S. [0000-0002-3046-9884] | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11541.2/116573 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Wiley Blackwell Publishing Asia | |
| dc.rights | Copyright 2015 Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology and Wiley Publishing | |
| dc.source.uri | https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-185X.12717 | |
| dc.subject | Humans | |
| dc.subject | Arthritis, Rheumatoid | |
| dc.subject | Antirheumatic Agents | |
| dc.subject | Immunosuppressive Agents | |
| dc.subject | Biological Products | |
| dc.subject | Treatment Outcome | |
| dc.subject | Program Evaluation | |
| dc.subject | Time Factors | |
| dc.subject | Drug Costs | |
| dc.subject | Health Expenditures | |
| dc.subject | Drug Utilization Review | |
| dc.subject | Australia | |
| dc.subject | Practice Patterns, Physicians' | |
| dc.subject | Clinical Decision-Making | |
| dc.subject | Leflunomide | |
| dc.title | Changes to the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefit Scheme restrictions for biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs have influenced the use of leflunomide | |
| dc.type | Journal article | |
| pubs.publication-status | Published | |
| ror.mmsid | 9916001111301831 |