Framing preparatory inchoate offences in the Criminal Code: the identity crime debacle
Files
(Restricted Access)
Date
2011
Authors
Leader-Elliott, I.
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Journal article
Citation
Criminal Law Journal, 2011; 35(2):80-97
Statement of Responsibility
Ian Leader-Elliott
Conference Name
Abstract
The Commonwealth Parliament recently enacted three new identity crimes, which lend their name to the omnibus Law and Justice Legislation Amendment (Identity Crimes and Other Measures) Act 2010 (Cth) . The Act makes it an offence to engage in conduct preliminary to the adoption of an assumed identity with the intention that the assumed identity will facilitate the commission of an indictable offence against Commonwealth law. The identity crimes are instances of increasing legislative resort to inchoate crimes of mere preparation that supplement and extend the traditional categories of attempt, conspiracy and incitement in Ch 2 of the Criminal Code. This article compares the identity crimes with conspiracy, drawing on recent High Court decisions on federal conspiracy law. It is argued that the new crimes are vitiated by serious errors in their formulation that appear to have resulted from failure to realise their essential kinship with the inchoate offences of Ch 2. Various amendments are suggested.
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Access Status
Rights
Copyright Status Unknown