Current studentsExisting staffContact us
 

Procurement sustainability tensions: an integrative perspective

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorFayezi, S.
dc.contributor.authorZomorrodi, M.
dc.contributor.authorBals, L.
dc.date.issued2018
dc.descriptionLink to a related website: https://unpaywall.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-01-2017-0013, Open Access via Unpaywall
dc.description.abstract<jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Purpose</jats:title> <jats:p>The purpose of this paper is to unpack tensions faced by procurement professionals as part of their triple bottom line (TBL) sustainability activities. The authors take an integrative perspective based on the procurement sustainability and organizational tensions literature, as well as stakeholder and institutional theory.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Design/methodology/approach</jats:title> <jats:p>The authors use a multiple case study approach. Data are collected through multiple interviews and archival data from eight case companies in Australia.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Findings</jats:title> <jats:p>The authors identify supply chain and company procurement sustainability tensions (PSTs) and explain their multi-level nature. The analysis also dissects the multi-stakeholder and multi-institutional environments where PSTs operate. The authors discuss such environments in terms of various temporal and spatial legitimacy contexts (LCs) that, through their assessment of institutional distance, can characterize the manifestation of PSTs.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Practical implications</jats:title> <jats:p>The findings are instrumental for managers to make informed decisions when dealing with PSTs, and they pave the way for paradoxical leadership given the increasing importance of simultaneous development and balancing of TBL dimensions, as evidenced in this study.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Originality/value</jats:title> <jats:p>This is one of the first studies to empirically investigate PSTs by drawing on an integrative approach to identify PSTs, and to discern various LCs that underpin stakeholder judgments of procurement’s TBL sustainability activities.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 2018; 48(6):586-609
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/IJPDLM-01-2017-0013
dc.identifier.issn0960-0035
dc.identifier.issn1758-664X
dc.identifier.orcidFayezi, S. [0000-0001-8885-3793]
dc.identifier.orcidZomorrodi, M. [0009-0001-3586-1551]
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11541.2/36015
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherEmerald
dc.rightsCopyright 2018 Emerald publishing
dc.source.urihttps://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-01-2017-0013
dc.subjectcase study
dc.subjectinstitutional theory
dc.subjectorganizational tensions
dc.subjectprocurement sustainability
dc.subjectprocurement sustainability tensions
dc.subjectstakeholder theory
dc.titleProcurement sustainability tensions: an integrative perspective
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.publication-statusPublished
ror.mmsid9916800026401831

Files

Collections