Assessment of block height for satisfactory spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section
Date
2012
Authors
Ousley, R.
Egan, C.
Dowling, K.
Cyna, A.
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Journal article
Citation
Anaesthesia, 2012; 67(12):1356-1363
Statement of Responsibility
R. Ousley, C. Egan, K. Dowling and A. M. Cyna
Conference Name
Abstract
We investigated block heights that anaesthetists considered adequate for caesarean section to proceed under spinal anaesthesia. During 3 months, 15 obstetric anaesthetists recorded block height to touch, pinprick or cold when spinal anaesthesia was considered satisfactory for caesarean section to proceed. Median (IQR [range]) block height for touch, pinprick, first cold and icy were: T10 (T7–T12 [T3–L1]); T5 (T4–T6 [C7–L1]); T5 (T4–T6 [C7–L1]); and T3 (T2–T4 [C7–L1]), respectively. Modalities were significantly correlated for: touch and cold, p = 0.0001; touch and icy, p = 0.0007; touch and pinprick, p = 0.0018; cold and icy, p < 0.0001; cold and pinprick, p = 0.0001; icy and pinprick, p < 0.0001. Pairwise comparisons showed differences between all modalities (p < 0.001) apart from pinprick and first cold (p = 0.94). All women had satisfactory anaesthesia despite 76 (81%) having a block to touch below T6. Single modality assessment of block height, particularly using touch, may erroneously indicate inadequate anaesthesia for caesarean section.
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Access Status
Rights
Anaesthesia © 2012 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland