Fate and dynamics of metal precipitates arising from acid drainage discharges to a river system

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMosley, L.M.
dc.contributor.authorBiswas, T.K.
dc.contributor.authorDang, T.
dc.contributor.authorPalmer, D.
dc.contributor.authorCummings, C.
dc.contributor.authorDaly, R.
dc.contributor.authorSimpson, S.
dc.contributor.authorKirby, J.
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractNeutralisation of acid drainage creates metal-rich precipitates that may impact receiving water bodies. This study assessed the fate of over seven years of acid drainage discharges on the sediments of the lower River Murray (Australia), including the potential for periodic water anoxia to enhance risk via reductive dissolution of amorphous (Fe, Mn and co-precipitated and bound metal) oxide phases. With the exception of one site with restricted water exchange, elevated reducible/reactive metal(oid) (Fe, Ni, As, Co, Zn) concentrations were only observed in the localised wetland-riparian area within approximately 100 m of the discharges. Only a minor exceedance of national sediment quality guideline values occurred for Ni. In the main river channel, elevated reactive metal (Fe, Mn, Ni, Zn) concentrations were also only observed less than approximately 100 m from the drainage discharge point. This appears due to (a) rapid neutralisation of pH leading to metal precipitation and deposition in the localised discharge area, and/or (b) dilution of any metal precipitates entering the main channel with natural river sediments, and/or (c) flushing of precipitates downstream during higher flow conditions. The influence of deoxygenation on metal release was profound with large increases in the concentration of dissolved Fe, Mn, Zn, Ni, and As in the overlying water during laboratory experimental simulations. However, given in situ sediment metal contamination is very localised, it appears on a river reach scale that the acid drainage precipitates will not significantly contribute, over and above, the background release of these metals during these conditions.
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityLuke M. Mosley, Tapas K. Biswas, Tan Dang, David Palmer, Courtney Cummings, Rob Daly, Stuart Simpson, Jason Kirby
dc.identifier.citationChemosphere, 2018; 212:811-820
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.08.146
dc.identifier.issn0045-6535
dc.identifier.issn1879-1298
dc.identifier.orcidMosley, L.M. [0000-0002-7446-8955]
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/118246
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP170104541
dc.rights© 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.source.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045653518316205
dc.subjectAcid drainage; metal contamination; reductive dissolution; deoxygenation; anoxia
dc.titleFate and dynamics of metal precipitates arising from acid drainage discharges to a river system
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.publication-statusPublished

Files

Collections

Earth and Environmental Sciences publications