The Metallography of dental amalgams

Date

1976

Authors

Abbott, John Russell

Editors

Advisors

Makinson, O. F.

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Type:

Thesis

Citation

Statement of Responsibility

Conference Name

Abstract

Porosity in dental amalgam has been investigated by many workers and several explanations of the probable cause of porosity have been documented. Artefact development during preparation of amalgam specimens for metallographic examination has had scant reference in the dental literature, and therefore it is the primary concern of this thesis to elucidate some of the factors which produce porosity as an artefact on polished surfaces of amalgam specimens. The present work has shown that porosity as an artefact can be produced by the removal of phases during the polishing process and by ultrasonic cleaning of specimens between polishing stages. The ease of manipulation, adequate mechanical properties and low cost has established amalgam as the primary choice material for dental restorations. There have been many publications on amalgam failure and it has been suggested that poor cavity design, faulty amalgam manipulation, marginal failure, creep and corrosion are responsible for defective amalgam restorations. The Y2 phase is the most reactive phase of dental amalgam and the presence of this phase is believed by some authors to predispose amalgam restorations to marginal breakdown. The present work investigates the Y2 phase by describing a chemical etch to define this phase, so allowing measurement of the volume fraction of Y2 phase in a range of amalgam alloys. For in vitro corrosion studies two chemical-methods for the dissolution of the Y2 phase are described. The thesis also describes an alternative polishing and etching procedure and examines whether vibratory polishing is suitable for final polishing of amalgam specimens.

School/Discipline

Department of Restorative Dentistry

Dissertation Note

Thesis (M.D.S.) -- University of Adelaide, Department of Restorative Dentistry, 1977.

Provenance

This electronic version is made publicly available by the University of Adelaide in accordance with its open access policy for student theses. Copyright in this thesis remains with the author. This thesis may incorporate third party material which has been used by the author pursuant to Fair Dealing exceptions. If you are the owner of any included third party copyright material you wish to be removed from this electronic version, please complete the take down form located at: http://www.adelaide.edu.au/legals

Description

Access Status

Rights

License

Grant ID

Published Version

Call number

Persistent link to this record