Hemodynamic and metabolic effects after nifedipine and ritodrine tocolysis

Date

2003

Authors

Papatsonis, D.
van Geijn, H.
Bleker, O.
Ader, H.
Dekker, G.

Editors

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Type:

Journal article

Citation

International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2003; 82(1):5-10

Statement of Responsibility

D. N. M. Papatsonis, H. P. van Geijn, O. P. Bleker, H. J. Adèr and G. A. Dekker

Conference Name

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to compare the hemodynamic and metabolic changes after ritodrine and nifedipine tocolysis. Methods: For an open randomized study, patients with preterm labor (N=185) were allocated to groups to receive ritodrine intravenously (N=90) or nifedipine orally (N=95). Results: The mean diastolic blood pressure was significantly lower in the ritodrine group 24 h (65±12 vs. 70±8, P=0.001) and 48 h (65±12 vs. 71±8, P=0.004) after starting tocolysis compared with the nifedipine group. Mean maternal heart rate was significantly higher in the ritodrine group 24 h (105±17 vs. 86±13, P<0.0001) and 48 h (100±21 vs. 85±12, P<0.0001) after starting tocolysis compared with the nifedipine group. Mean fasting glucose levels were higher (6.68±2.53 vs. 4.93±1.23, P=0.0016), while mean potassium levels were lower (3.52±0.84 vs. 3.81±0.45, P=0.04) in the ritodrine group 48 h after starting tocolysis compared with the nifedipine group. Conclusions: Use of nifedipine for preterm labor is associated with a lower incidence of adverse hemodynamic and metabolic changes compared with ritodrine after 24 and 48 h of tocolysis. In our opinion nifedipine is the preferred drug of choice for the treatment of preterm labor.

School/Discipline

Dissertation Note

Provenance

Description

Access Status

Rights

Copyright © 2003 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

License

Grant ID

Call number

Persistent link to this record