Patient preferences for managing insomnia: a discrete choice experiment
Date
2018
Authors
Cheung, J.M.Y.
Bartlett, D.J.
Armour, C.L.
Saini, B.
Laba, T.L.
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Journal article
Citation
Patient, 2018; 11(5):503-514
Statement of Responsibility
Conference Name
Abstract
BackgroundDespite the rapid development of effective treatments, both pharmacological and non-pharmacological, insomnia management remains suboptimal at the practice interface. Patient preferences play a critical role in influencing treatment outcomes. However, there is currently a mismatch between patient preferences and clinician recommendations, partly perpetuated by a limited understanding of the patients' decision-making process.ObjectivesThe aim of our study was to empirically quantify patient preferences for treatment attributes common to both pharmacological and non-pharmacological insomnia treatments.MethodAn efficient dual-response discrete choice experiment was conducted to evaluate patient treatment preferences for managing insomnia. The sample included 205 patients with self-reported insomnia and an Insomnia Severity Index14. Participants were presented with two unlabelled hypothetical scenarios with an opt-out option across 12 choice sets. Data were analyzed using a mixed multinomial logit model to investigate the influence of five attributes (i.e. time, onset of action, maintainability of improved sleep, length of treatment, and monthly cost) on treatment preferences.ResultsTreatments were preferentially viewed if they conferred long-term sleep benefits (p<0.05); had an ongoing, as opposed to a predefined, duration of treatment course (p<0.05); required some, as opposed to no, additional time commitment (p<0.05); and had lower monthly out-of-pocket treatment costs (p<0.001). However, treatment onset of action had no influence on preference. Age, help-seeking status, concession card status and fatigue severity significantly influenced treatment preference.ConclusionParticipants' prioritization of investing time in treatment and valuing the maintainability of therapeutic gains suggests a stronger inclination towards non-pharmacological treatment, defying current assumptions that patients prefer quick-fixes' for managing insomnia.
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Data source: Supplementary material, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-018-0303-y
Access Status
Rights
Copyright 2018 Springer