The ballot behind bars after Roach: why disenfranchise prisoners?

Date

2008

Authors

Koch, C.
Hill, L.

Editors

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Type:

Journal article

Citation

Alternative Law Journal, 2008; 33(4):220-224

Statement of Responsibility

Cornelia Koch and Lisa Hill

Conference Name

Abstract

This article explores and critiques the rationales for disenfranchising prisoners advanced by politicians and relied on by the majority of the High Court in the recent case of Roach v Electoral Commissioner. It also refers to relevant overseas cases. It is argued that none of the arguments for removal of the right to vote from prison inmates are persuasive. While Australian constitutional history makes it probably inevitable that some bans on prisoner voting are constitutionally valid, the onus is on the Australian Parliament to demonstrate leadership and give all prisoners the right to vote.

School/Discipline

Dissertation Note

Provenance

Description

Access Status

Rights

License

Grant ID

Call number

Persistent link to this record