Do cladistic and morphometric data capture common patterns of morphological disparity?
Date
2015
Authors
Hetherington, A.
Sherratt, E.
Ruta, M.
Wilkinson, M.
Deline, B.
Donoghue, P.
Editors
Angielczyk, K.
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Journal article
Citation
Palaeontology, 2015; 58(3):393-399
Statement of Responsibility
Alexander J. Hetherington, Emma Sherratt, Marcello Ruta, Mark Wilkinson, Bradley Deline and Philip C.J. Donoghue
Conference Name
Abstract
The distinctly non-random diversity of organismal form manifests itself in discrete clusters of taxa that share a common body plan. As a result, analyses of disparity require a scalable comparative framework. The difficulties of applying geometric morphometrics to disparity analyses of groups with vastly divergent body plans are overcome partly by the use of cladistic characters. Character-based disparity analyses have become increasingly popular, but it is not clear how they are affected by character coding strategies or revisions of primary homology statements. Indeed, whether cladistic and morphometric data capture similar patterns of morphological variation remains a moot point. To address this issue, we employ both cladistic and geometric morphometric data in an exploratory study of disparity focussing on caecilian amphibians. Our results show no impact on relative intertaxon distances when different coding strategies for cladistic characters were used or when revised concepts of homology were considered. In all instances, we found no statistically significant difference between pairwise Euclidean and Procrustes distances, although the strength of the correlation among distance matrices varied. This suggests that cladistic and geometric morphometric data appear to summarize morphological variation in comparable ways. Our results support the use of cladistic data for characterizing organismal disparity.
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Access Status
Rights
© 2015 The Authors. Palaeontology published by John Wiley & Sons on behalf of The Palaeontological Association.