Patient-reported questionnaires to identify adverse drug reactions: a systematic review

Files

ijerph-18-11877.pdf (662.54 KB)
  (Published version)

Date

2021

Authors

Lim, R.
Kalisch Ellett, L.
Roughead, E.E.
Cheah, P.Y.
Masnoon, N.

Editors

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Type:

Journal article

Citation

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021; 18(22, article no. 11877):1-17

Statement of Responsibility

Conference Name

Abstract

Background: This systematic review aims to summarise available patient-reported questionnaires to detect adverse drug reactions (ADRs) that can be utilised by healthcare professionals in clinical practice and to summarise the psychometric properties (validity, reliability, and responsiveness) of the questionnaires. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using Medline, Pubmed, Embase, and Emcare databases to screen for articles published between January 2000 and July 2020. Data items regarding validity, reliability, and responsiveness were extracted independently by two authors. The methodological quality was assessed using the COSMIN (Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments) checklist. Results: A total of 1563 unique article titles were identified after removing duplicates. Following shortlisting of relevant articles, 19 patient-reported ADR questionnaires were identified. Questionnaires most commonly focused on mental health medications (42.1%, n = 8), followed by general questionnaires applicable to any medication (21.1%, n = 4). Many questionnaires did not report assessing the validity and reliability of the measurement tool. For example, only 11 questionnaires (58%) mentioned assessing content validity, in addition to criterion or construct testing. Conclusion: This systematic review summarised the available patient-reported questionnaires that can be used in research and clinical practice to identify ADRs. Results of this systematic review highlight the need for more robust validity and reliability testing when developing patient-reported ADR questionnaires.

School/Discipline

Dissertation Note

Provenance

Description

Data source: Supplementary Materials, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182211877

Access Status

Rights

Copyright 2021 by the authors.Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

License

Grant ID

Call number

Persistent link to this record