Comparison of Isohelix™ and Rayon swabbing systems for touch DNA recovery from metal surfaces
Date
2021
Authors
Bonsu, D.O.M.
Rodie, M.
Higgins, D.
Henry, J.
Austin, J.J.
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Journal article
Citation
Forensic Science Medicine and Pathology, 2021; 17(4):577-584
Statement of Responsibility
Dan O. M. Bonsu, Matthew Rodie, Denice Higgins, Julianne Henry, Jeremy J. Austin
Conference Name
Abstract
A previous study evaluating two swabbing systems found that DNA was best recovered from sterile metal substrates using an Isohelix™ swab wetted with isopropyl alcohol rather than a Rayon swab with water as the wetting agent. We tested the same swabbing systems on metal (aluminum, brass, and stainless steel) and plastic substrates in a regularly touched environment to simulate the non-deliberate transfer of touch evidence likely seen in a casework scenario, to ascertain the performance of these swabs in an uncontrolled situation. Higher amounts of touch DNA were recovered with Isohelix™ swabs (0.5 – 3.3 ng) compared to Rayon swabs (0.13 – 1.2 ng). The Isohelix™ swabbing system was found to significantly recover more touch DNA (p = 0.04) from the metal substrates than the Rayon swabbing system, consistent with the findings of our previous work. The results contribute to our understanding of the impact of sample collection techniques on touch DNA recovery from problematic metal surfaces and suggest that supplemental cleaning of substrates as a precautionary step against the spread of infections may affect touch DNA persistence and the recovery efficiency of swabs.
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Published online: 21 October 2021
Access Status
Rights
© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021