Field intercomparison of a novel optical sensor for formaldehyde quantification
Date
2000
Authors
Friedfeld, S.
Fraser, M.
Lancaster, D.
Leleux, D.
Rehle, D.
Tittel, F.
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Journal article
Citation
Geophysical Research Letters, 2000; 27(14):2093-2096
Statement of Responsibility
Stephen Friedfeld, Matthew Fraser, David Lancaster, Darrin Leleux, Dirk Rehle and Frank Tittel
Conference Name
Abstract
<jats:p>A one‐week <jats:italic>in situ</jats:italic> intercomparison campaign was completed on the Rice University campus for measuring HCHO using three different techniques, including a novel optical sensor based on difference frequency generation (DFG) operating at room temperature. Two chemical derivatization methods, 2,4‐dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) and <jats:italic>o</jats:italic>‐(2,3,4,5,6‐pentafluorobenzyl) hydroxylamine (PFBHA), were deployed during the daylight hours for three‐ to four‐hour time‐integrated samples. A real‐time optical sensor based on laser absorption spectroscopy was operated simultaneously, including nighttime hours. This tunable spectroscopic source based on difference frequency mixing of two fiber‐amplified diode lasers in periodically poled LiNbO<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> (PPLN) was operated at 3.5315 µm (2831.64 cm<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>) to access a strong HCHO ro‐vibrational transition free of interferences from other species. The results showed a bias of −1.7 and −1.2 ppbv and a gross error of 2.6 and 1.5 ppbv for DNPH and PFBHA measurements, respectively, compared with DFG measurements. These results validate the DFG sensor for time‐resolved measurements of HCHO in urban areas.</jats:p>
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Access Status
Rights
Copyright 2000 by the American Geophysical Union