Proposed vehicle impact speed - severe injury probability relationships for selected crash types

Files

hdl_98594.pdf (539.21 KB)
  (Published version)

Date

2015

Authors

Jurewicz, C.
Sobhani, A.
Woolley, J.
Dutschke, J.
Corben, B.

Editors

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Type:

Conference paper

Citation

Proceedings of the 2015 Australasian Road Safety Conference, 2015, pp.1-11

Statement of Responsibility

Chris Jurewicz, Dr Amir Sobhani, Dr Jeremy Woolley, Dr Jeff Dutschke, Dr Bruce Corben

Conference Name

Australasian Road Safety Conference (ACRS) (14 Oct 2015 - 16 Oct 2015 : Gold Coast, Qld)

Abstract

Speed is recognised as a key contributor to crash likelihood and severity, and to road safety performance in general. Its fundamental role has been recognised by making Safe Speeds one of the four pillars of the Safe System. In this context, impact speeds above which humans are likely to sustain fatal injuries have been accepted as a reference in many Safe System infrastructure policy and planning discussions. To date, there have been no proposed relationships for impact speeds above which humans are likely to sustain fatal or serious (severe) injury, a more relevant Safe System measure. A research project on Safe System intersection design required a critical review of published literature on the relationship between impact speed and probability of injury. This has led to a number of questions being raised about the origins, accuracy and appropriateness of the currently accepted impact speed–fatality probability relationships (Wramborg 2005) in many policy documents. The literature review identified alternative, more recent and more precise relationships derived from the US crash reconstruction databases (NASS/CDS). The paper proposes for discussion a set of alternative relationships between vehicle impact speed and probability of MAIS3+ (fatal and serious) injury for selected common crash types. Proposed Safe System critical impact speed values are also proposed for use in road infrastructure assessment. The paper presents the methodology and assumptions used in developing these relationships. It identifies further research needed to confirm and refine these relationships. Such relationships would form valuable inputs into future road safety policies in Australia and New Zealand.

School/Discipline

Dissertation Note

Provenance

Description

Access Status

Rights

Copyright: Authors retain copyright of papers presented at the Australasian College of Road Safety Conferences.

License

Grant ID

Call number

Persistent link to this record