Strengthening advocacy efforts with empirical evidence: a case example of the conduct, uptake and utilisation of research in drug policy decision-making in Vietnam

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorVuong, T.
dc.contributor.authorRitter, A.
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, N.
dc.contributor.authorAli, R.
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractAbstract not available
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityThu Vuong, Alison Ritter, Nhu Nguyen, Robert Ali
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Drug Policy, 2017; 49:41-47
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.07.029
dc.identifier.issn0955-3959
dc.identifier.issn1873-4758
dc.identifier.orcidAli, R. [0000-0003-2905-8153]
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/110170
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1021988
dc.rights© 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
dc.source.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.07.029
dc.subjectDrug policy; evidence-based policy making; research utilisation; compulsory treatment; methadone treatment; Vietnam; East and Southeast Asia
dc.titleStrengthening advocacy efforts with empirical evidence: a case example of the conduct, uptake and utilisation of research in drug policy decision-making in Vietnam
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.publication-statusPublished

Files

Collections

Medicine publications