Should we look for a low-grade threshold for blastocyst transfer? A scoping review

Date

2021

Authors

Kemper, J.M.
Liu, Y.
Afnan, M.
Hammond, E.R.
Morbeck, D.E.
Mol, B.W.J.

Editors

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Type:

Journal article

Citation

Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 2021; 42(4):709-716

Statement of Responsibility

James M.Kemper, Yanhe Liu, Masoud Afnan, Elizabeth R.Hammond, Dean E.Morbeck, Ben W.J.Mol

Conference Name

Abstract

Embryo quality is a key determinant of the success of IVF. Although the focus has been on selecting the best embryo for transfer, the classification of low-grade blastocysts (LGB) in existing scoring systems has received less attention. This is worrisome; embryo freezing allows optimal use of all created embryos, thus maximizing the cumulative live birth rate, which is arguably the most important outcome for infertile couples. A PubMed search was conducted in August 2020, using ‘(((‘poor-quality’ OR ‘poor quality’) OR (‘low-grade’ OR ‘low grade’)) AND (‘embryo’ OR ‘blastocyst’)) AND (‘pregnancy’ OR ‘live birth’)’. This scoping review shows that LGB have similar euploidy and pregnancy success rates after implantation and have no adverse effects on pregnancy or perinatal outcomes. Evidence for pregnancy outcomes is lacking for different grades of LGB, with most studies clustering all LQB as one to compare with optimal blastocysts.

School/Discipline

Dissertation Note

Provenance

Description

Access Status

Rights

© 2021 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

License

Grant ID

Call number

Persistent link to this record