A diachronous record of metamorphism in metapelites of the Western Gneiss Region, Norway
Files
(Published version)
Date
2022
Authors
March, S.
Hand, M.
Tamblyn, R.
Carvalho, B.
Clark, C.
Editors
White, R.
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Journal article
Citation
Journal of Metamorphic Geology, 2022; 40(6):1121-1158
Statement of Responsibility
Samantha March, Martin Hand, Renée Tamblyn, Bruna B. Carvalho, Chris Clark
Conference Name
Abstract
In this study, data from garnet-kyanite metapelites in ultrahigh-pressure (UHP) domains of the Western Gneiss Region (WGR), Norway is presented. U–Pb geochronology and trace element compositions in zircon, monazite, apatite, rutile and garnet were acquired, and pressure–temperature (P–T) conditions were calculated using mineral equilibria forward modelling and Zr-in-rutile thermometry. Garnet-kyanite gneiss from Ulsteinvik record a prograde evolution passing through ~690–710 °C and ~9–11 kbar. Zircon and rutile age and thermometry data indicate these prograde conditions significantly pre-date Silurian UHP subduction in the WGR and are interpreted to record early Caledonian subduction of continental-derived allochthons. Minimum peak conditions in the Ulsteinvik metapelite occur at ~28 kbar, constrained by an inferred garnet + kyanite + omphacite + muscovite + rutile + coesite + H2O assemblage. The retrograde evolution passed through ~740 °C and ~7 kbar, firstly recorded by the destruction of omphacite and followed by the partial replacement of kyanite and garnet by cordierite and spinel. Garnet-kyanite metapelite from the diamond-bearing Fjørtoft outcrop document a polymetamorphic history, with garnet forming during the late Mesoproterozoic and limited preservation of high-pressure Caledonian assemblages. Similar to the Ulsteinvik metapelite, zircon and rutile age data from the Fjørtoft metapelite also record pre-Scandian Caledonian ages. Two potential tectonic scenarios are possible: (1) the samples were exhumed at different times during pre-Scandian subduction of the Blåhø nappe, or (2) the samples do not share a history in the same nappe complex, instead the Ulsteinvik metapelite is a constituent of the Seve-Blåhø Nappe, whilst the Fjørtoft metapelite shares its history within a separate nappe complex.
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Correction added on 17 May 2022, after first online publication: CAUL funding statement has been added.
First published: 22 February 2022
Access Status
Rights
© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Metamorphic Geology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.