Blood pressure responses in healthy older people to 50 g carbohydrate drinks with differing glycaemic effects
Files
(Published version)
Date
2004
Authors
Visvanathan, R.
Chen, R.
Horowitz, M.
Chapman, I.
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Journal article
Citation
British Journal of Nutrition, 2004; 92(2):335-340
Statement of Responsibility
Renuka Visvanathan, Richard Chen, Michael Horowitz and Ian Chapman
Conference Name
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to determine the effects on blood pressure response of 50 g carbohydrate drinks with differing glycaemic effects in ten healthy elderly subjects (age >65 years; randomized crossover design). Systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP) and mean arterial (MAP) blood pressure, heart rate and plasma glucose levels were determined following ingestion of equal volumes (379 ml) of water and 50 g carbohydrate drinks with differing reported glycaemic indices (GI) (surrogate marker for glycaemic effect): (1) low-GI: Apple & Cherry Juice; (2) intermediate-GI: Fanta Orange; (3) high-glucose. Glucose (SBP and DBP P,0·001; MAP P¼0·005) and Fanta Orange (SBP P¼0·005; DBP and MAP P,0·001) ingestion caused a significant decrease in BP whilst blood pressure increased (SBP P¼0·008; MAP P¼0·005) from baseline following Apple & Cherry Juice ingestion. Water had no significant effect on postprandial blood pressure. Fanta Orange and Apple & Cherry Juice caused similar (P¼0·679) glycaemic effects, which were significantly greater than water, but lower than glucose (P,0·001). There was no significant correlation between the glycaemic effect of the carbohydrate drinks and there was no change in blood pressure from baseline (SBP r 20·123, P¼0·509; DBP r 20·051, P¼0·784; MAP r 20·069, P¼0·712). Apple & Cherry Juice and Fanta Orange had similar glycaemic effects, but differing effects on blood pressure. Therefore, it is unlikely that the glycaemic effect of a drink can be used to predict the subsequent cardiovascular response.
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Published online by Cambridge University Press 09 Mar 2007
Description
Access Status
Rights
© The Authors 2004