Current studentsExisting staffContact us
 

Novak Djokovic's path to legal vindication was long and convoluted. It may also be fleeting.

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMcIntyre, J.
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractNovak Djokovic is – at least for now – free to defend his title at the Australian Open after Judge Anthony Kelly of the Federal Circuit and Family Court quashed the cancellation of his visa following an agreement between the tennis star’s lawyers and the government. After a confusing day-long hearing involving dense legal arguments, Djokovic was ordered to be released from immigration detention on procedural grounds – the judge said he hadn’t been given enough time to contest the original cancellation of his visa last Thursday morning. But this left unresolved the bigger question of whether Djokovic was entitled to rely upon a medical exemption from Tennis Australia to enter the country and compete in the tournament without being vaccinated against COVID-19.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11541.2/27305
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherThe Conversation
dc.rightsCopyright 2022 the author. This publication is available under a Creative Commons Attribution No Derivatives licence. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/)
dc.source.urihttps://theconversation.com/novak-djokovics-path-to-legal-vindication-was-long-and-convoluted-it-may-also-be-fleeting-174603
dc.subjectvaccination
dc.subjecttennis Australia
dc.subjectAustralian Open
dc.subjectNovak Djokovic
dc.subjectCOVID-19
dc.titleNovak Djokovic's path to legal vindication was long and convoluted. It may also be fleeting.
dc.typeWebsite
pubs.publication-statusPublished
ror.mmsid9916608849901831

Files

Collections