Whole animal experiments should be more like human randomized controlled trials

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMuhlhausler, B.
dc.contributor.authorBloomfield, F.
dc.contributor.authorGillman, M.
dc.date.issued2013
dc.description.abstractThe quality of reporting of animal studies lags behind that of human randomized controlled trials but a series of additions to the ARRIVE guidelines will help ensure that the standards are comparable.
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityBeverly S. Muhlhausler, Frank H. Bloomfield, Matthew W. Gillman
dc.identifier.citationPLoS Biology, 2013; 11(2):1-6
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pbio.1001481
dc.identifier.issn1545-7885
dc.identifier.issn1545-7885
dc.identifier.orcidMuhlhausler, B. [0000-0002-9021-6790]
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/80148
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science
dc.rights© 2013 Muhlhausler et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
dc.source.urihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001481
dc.subjectAnimals
dc.subjectAnimal Experimentation
dc.subjectResearch Design
dc.subjectRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic
dc.titleWhole animal experiments should be more like human randomized controlled trials
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.publication-statusPublished

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
hdl_80148.pdf
Size:
237.03 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version
Download

Collections

Agriculture, Food and Wine publications