Re-thinking metaphors for research degree candidature and academic careers: beyond the ‘journey’, towards enhanced inclusivity
Date
2025
Authors
Booij, S.
Cannell, C.
Henry, S.
Jarrett, E.
Roche, G.
Brady-Clark, A.
Lovell, B.
Rice, E.
Nazari, M.
Rozitis, S.
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Journal article
Citation
New Writing, online, 2025; 22(4):465-483
Statement of Responsibility
Conference Name
Abstract
As recent research into metaphors for research degree candidature and academic careers shows, metaphor choices can influence thought and affect in ways that matter significantly for personal wellbeing and scholarly outcomes. Journey metaphors are widely observed as among the most common metaphors in current use. Studies indicate that, while helpful for some people at some moments, these dominant metaphors are in many cases inappropriate or even actively detrimental. Drawing on queer-feminist theory, disability studies, anticolonial theory, and fat studies, this article shows how the journey metaphors tend to more readily fit the experiences of researchers who are intersectionally privileged by race, gender, culture, sexuality, social class, body size, and neurotypicality than those who experience marginalisation across one or more axes of social experience. Additionally, journey metaphors belie the non-linear, messily surprising processes of creative research. The journey's dominance thus reinforces social and epistemic inequities. To counter this, we argue the benefits of researchers creating fresh metaphors for their own bespoke experiences. As illustration, we present and discuss a suite of metaphors we produced in a transgeographic creative critical collaboration.
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Access Status
Rights
Copyright 2025 The Author(s). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properlycited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent. (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)