The theta-logistic is unreliable for modelling most census data
Date
2010
Authors
Clark, F.
Brook, B.
Delean, J.
Akcakaya, H.
Bradshaw, C.
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Journal article
Citation
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2010; 1(3):253-262
Statement of Responsibility
Francis Clark, Barry W. Brook, Steven Delean, H. Reşit Akçakaya and Corey J. A. Bradshaw
Conference Name
Abstract
<jats:title>Summary</jats:title><jats:p><jats:bold>1.</jats:bold>The theta‐logistic is a simple and flexible model for describing how the growth rate of a population slows as abundance increases. Starting at<jats:italic>r</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>m</jats:italic></jats:sub>(taken as the maximum population growth rate), the growth response decreases in a convex or concave way (according to the shape parameter θ) to zero when the population reaches carrying capacity.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>2.</jats:bold>We demonstrate that fitting this model to census data is not robust and explain why. The parameters θ and<jats:italic>r</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>m</jats:italic></jats:sub>are able to play‐off against each other (providing a constant product), thus allowing both to adopt extreme and ecologically implausible values.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>3.</jats:bold>We use simulated data to examine: (i) a population fluctuating around a constant carrying capacity (<jats:italic>K</jats:italic>); (ii) recovery of a population from 10% of carrying capacity; and (iii) a population subject to variation in<jats:italic>K</jats:italic>. We show that estimates of extinction risk depending on this or similar models are therefore prone to imprecision. We refute the claim that concave growth responses are shown to dominate in nature.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>4.</jats:bold>As the model can also be sensitive to temporal variation in carrying capacity, we argue that the assumption of a constant carrying capacity is both problematic and presents a fruitful direction for the development of phenomenological density‐feedback models.</jats:p>
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Access Status
Rights
© 2010 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2010 British Ecological Society