Profiles of intended responses to requests for assisted dying: a cross-sectional study
Date
2021
Authors
Wilson, M.
Ostroff, C.
Wilson, M.E.
Wiechula, R.
Cusack, L.
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Journal article
Citation
International Journal of Nursing Studies, 2021; 124(104069):104069-104069
Statement of Responsibility
Conference Name
Abstract
Background: Responding to legal medically assisted dying requests may become the most frequent form of nurses' participation in that service. Recent research has explored nurses' discrete responses to requests about or for assisted dying; however, nurses likely hold intentions for multiple responses to these requests. These intentions form patterns shaped by individual factors such as attitude and beliefs. No research has investigated patterns of multiple responses to requests for assisted dying, how these patterns form profiles of nurses and factors that might explain these response profiles. Objectives: Identify patterns of multiple responses that nurses intend for requests for assisted dying. Explore how these patterns form profiles of nurses' who share similar patterns of intended responses. Finally, investigate how attitude, norms and beliefs distinguish response profiles. Design: Cross-sectional survey. Settings: Online survey of Australian nurses. Participants: 365 experienced registered nurses (years in nursing mean = 23, SD = 14.21) working primarily with adults across various practice settings. Methods: Principal components analysis identified five types of intended responses. K-means cluster analysis was then used to develop profiles of nurses' intended responses across these five responses. Multinomial logit regression was utilised to examine psychosocial variables that distinguished different profiles. Results: Cluster analysis resulted in five profiles that reflect different patterns of intended responses by nurses -Facilitator, Complier, Expediter, Objector, and Detached. Logit regressions of explanatory variables indicated that nurses' attitude toward assisted dying, ethical beliefs, and social norms predicted nurses' membership in intended response profiles. The overall model was statistically significant, chi(2)(20) = 106.527, p < .001, and the predictors accounted for 25.3% of the variance in the profiles (Cox and Snell test: Pseudo R-2 = 0.253). Conclusion: Nurses intended responses have been usefully constructed as five patterns or profiles of multiple responses. These profiles represent different types and levels of engagement with requests. Further, attitude and social expectations distinguish profiles with stronger intentions to engage positively. Using a cluster analysis methodology provides a more holistic understanding of nurses' intended responses to assisted dying requests by focusing on various responses and demonstrating that nurses have distinctive patterns of responses.
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Data source: Supplementary materials, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104069
Access Status
Rights
Copyright 2021 Elsevier