Breaking Through the Façade: The Effects of the Own Race Advantage and Surgical Face Masks on Age Estimation and Facial Recognition Ability

Date

2022

Authors

Phillis, Isabelle

Editors

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Type:

Thesis

Citation

Statement of Responsibility

Conference Name

Abstract

This study examined the effect of surgical face masks and own-race advantage in age estimation accuracy and facial recognition of masked and unmasked strangers. To do so, participants completed an age estimation task of Black and White strangers, with half of the strangers masked and the other half unmasked. Following this, a facial recognition task asked participants to identify which strangers they had previously estimated the ages of. Results indicated that individuals tend to be inaccurate in their estimates of unmasked strangers by a Median of 6.26 years. Face masks were shown to harm age estimation ability of own-race strangers, with inaccuracy increasing by about 3 years when strangers were White. This suggests an own-race disadvantage is present in age estimation of masked strangers. Results also indicate that face masks reduce an individual's facial recognition ability of once-seen strangers. This is particularly the case when strangers are Black, as White people are more prone to say they do not recognise a stranger when they are Black and masked. This suggests that an own-race advantage exists when recognising the face of a once-seen masked stranger. These findings have important forensic implications, as they suggest that it may be harder for eyewitnesses to accurately estimate the age of offenders who wear masks during offending. This effect may be exacerbated if both the offender and eyewitness are White. Furthermore, it may be more difficult for eyewitnesses to later recognise previously masked offenders from a line-up, particularly if an offender is from a different race.

School/Discipline

School of Psychology

Dissertation Note

Thesis (B.PsychSc(Hons)) -- University of Adelaide, School of Psychology, 2022

Provenance

This electronic version is made publicly available by the University of Adelaide in accordance with its open access policy for student theses. Copyright in this thesis remains with the author. This thesis may incorporate third party material which has been used by the author pursuant to Fair Dealing exceptions. If you are the author of this thesis and do not wish it to be made publicly available, or you are the owner of any included third party copyright material you wish to be removed from this electronic version, please complete the take down form located at: http://www.adelaide.edu.au/legals

Description

This item is only available electronically.

Access Status

Rights

License

Grant ID

Published Version

Call number

Persistent link to this record