Accuracy of estimating resting oxygen uptake and implications for hemodynamic assessment
Date
2012
Authors
Narang, N.
Gore, M.O.
Snell, P.G.
Ayers, C.R.
Lorenzo, S.
Carrick Ranson, G.
Babb, T.G.
Levine, B.D.
Khera, A.
De Lemos, J.A.
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Journal article
Citation
American Journal of Cardiology, 2012; 109(4):594-598
Statement of Responsibility
Conference Name
Abstract
The Fick principle (cardiac output [Qc] = oxygen uptake [Vo2]/arteriovenous oxygen difference) can be used to calculate Qc, with VO2frequently estimated by derived equations. To compare the accuracy of measured versus estimated VO2, data were analyzed from 2 studies in which VO2at rest was measured using the Douglas bag technique. One study comprised adults with diabetes, and the other was an exercise study of healthy adults. VO2at rest was estimated as VO2(ml/min) = 125 ml/min/m2× body surface area (m2), with sensitivity analyses evaluating 2 other commonly used equations. Mean absolute difference (milliliters per minute) and ordinary least products regression were used to assess agreement between measured and estimated VO2. Overall, mean measured versus estimated VO2differed significantly (307.2 ± 75.2 vs 259.9 ± 36.7 ml/min, p <0.0001), with a mean absolute difference of 52.9 ± 43.2 ml/min (p <0.0001); 20% of the estimates differed by >25% from the measured VO2. Mean absolute difference increased from 36.7 ml/min in the lowest body mass index group (<25 kg/m2) to 91.7 ml/min in the highest group (<40 kg/m2) (p for trend = 0.001) and was significantly higher in men than in women (65.6 vs 33.9 ml/min, p = 0.001); error was similar by median-split age (p = 0.65) and race (p = 0.34). Similar results were obtained when evaluating each of the other 2 estimating equations. Estimation of VO2at rest is inaccurate, especially in men and with increasing adiposity. In conclusion, when clinical hemodynamic assessment is performed, VO2should be measured, not estimated.
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Access Status
Rights
Copyright 2012 Elsevier