Sex and risk of hip implant failure: assessing total hip arthroplasty outcomes in the United States

Date

2013

Authors

Inacio, M.C.S.
Ake, C.F.
Paxton, E.W.
Khatod, M.
Wang, C.
Gross, T.P.
Kaczmarek, R.G.
Marinac Dabic, D.
Sedrakyan, A.

Editors

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Type:

Journal article

Citation

JAMA Internal Medicine, 2013; 173(6):435-441

Statement of Responsibility

Conference Name

Abstract

Importance: The role of sex in relationship to implant failure after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is important for patient management and device innovation. Objective: To evaluate the association of sex with shortterm risk of THA revision after adjusting for patient, implant, surgery, surgeon, and hospital confounders. Design and Setting: A prospective cohort of patients enrolled in a total joint replacement registry from April 1, 2001, through December 31, 2010. Participants: Patients undergoing primary, elective, unilateral THA. Main Outcome Measures: Failure of THA, defined as revision procedure for (1) any reason, (2) septic reason, or (3) aseptic reason after the index procedure Results: A total of 35 140 THAs with 3.0 years of median follow-up were identified. Women constituted 57.5% of the study sample, and the mean (SD) patient age was 65.7 (11.6) years. A higher proportion of women received 28-mm femoral heads (28.2% vs 13.1%) and had metal on highly cross-linked polyethylene-bearing surfaces (60.6% vs 53.7%) than men. Men had a higher proportion of 36-mm or larger heads (55.4% vs 32.8%) and metal on metal-bearing surfaces (19.4% vs 9.6%). At 5-year follow-up, implant survival was 97.4% (95% CI, 97.2%- 97.6%). Device survival for men (97.7%; 95% CI, 97.4%- 98.0%) vs women (97.1%; 95% CI, 96.8%-97.4%) was significantly different (P=.01). After adjustments, the hazards ratios for women were 1.29 (95% CI, 1.11-1.51) for allcause revision, 1.32 (95% CI, 1.10-1.58) for aseptic revision, and 1.17 (95% CI, 0.81-1.68) for septic revision. Conclusions: After considering patient-, surgery-, surgeon-, volume-, and implant-specific risk factors, women had a 29% higher risk of implant failure than men after THA in this community-based sample.

School/Discipline

Dissertation Note

Provenance

Description

Access Status

Rights

Copyright 2013 American Medical Association

License

Grant ID

Call number

Persistent link to this record