Reporting quality and risk of bias in JBI systematic reviews evaluating the effectiveness of interventions: a methodological review protocol.

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorGrammatopoulos, T.
dc.contributor.authorHunter, J.W.S.
dc.contributor.authorMunn, Z.
dc.contributor.authorStone, J.C.
dc.contributor.authorBarker, T.H.
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractObjective: The objective of this methodological review is to evaluate the adherence of systematic reviews of effectiveness published in JBI Evidence Synthesis to reporting guidelines and methodological quality. Introduction: Systematic reviews of effectiveness are essential tools for health practitioners and policy-makers. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines and the Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews (ROBIS) tool are used to ensure maintenance of high reporting standards and methodological quality, respectively. This review will utilize these tools to identify strengths and shortfalls in the reporting quality of JBI systematic reviews of effectiveness. Inclusion criteria: This review will include the 20 most recent systematic reviews of effectiveness published in JBI Evidence Synthesis. Methods: This review will search MEDLINE (PubMed) for effectiveness reviews published in JBI Evidence Synthesis. Abstract and full-text screening will be performed by 2 independent reviewers, and the most recent 20 studies will be selected for inclusion. Data regarding adherence to PRISMA 2020 and ROBIS will be extracted by 2 independent reviewers. Data will be presented descriptively with tables and synthesized narratively.
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityTahlia Grammatopoulos, Jeremy W.S. Hunter, Zachary Munn, Jennifer C. Stone, Timothy Hugh Barker
dc.identifier.citationJBI Evidence Synthesis, 2023; 21(3):584-591
dc.identifier.doi10.11124/jbies-22-00317
dc.identifier.issn2689-8381
dc.identifier.issn2689-8381
dc.identifier.orcidGrammatopoulos, T. [0000-0001-9893-9793]
dc.identifier.orcidMunn, Z. [0000-0002-7091-5842]
dc.identifier.orcidStone, J.C. [0000-0002-3787-6175] [0000-0002-7848-1401]
dc.identifier.orcidBarker, T.H. [0000-0002-6897-814X]
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2440/140301
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1195676
dc.rights© 2023 JBI.
dc.source.urihttps://doi.org/10.11124/jbies-22-00317
dc.subjecteffectiveness reviews; methodological review; reporting quality; risk of bias; systematic review
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshReview Literature as Topic
dc.subject.meshBias
dc.titleReporting quality and risk of bias in JBI systematic reviews evaluating the effectiveness of interventions: a methodological review protocol.
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.publication-statusPublished

Files

Collections

Medicine publications