The growth of acronyms in the scientific literature
Files
(Published Version)
Date
2020
Authors
Barnett, A.
Doubleday, Z.
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Journal article
Citation
eLife, 2020; 9:e60080-1-e60080-10
Statement of Responsibility
Adrian Barnett and Zoe Doubleday
Conference Name
Abstract
Some acronyms are useful and are widely understood, but many of the acronyms used in scientific papers hinder understanding and contribute to the increasing fragmentation of science. Here we report the results of an analysis of more than 24 million article titles and 18 million article abstracts published between 1950 and 2019. There was at least one acronym in 19% of the titles and 73% of the abstracts. Acronym use has also increased over time, but the re-use of acronyms has declined. We found that from more than one million unique acronyms in our data, just over 2,000 (0.2%) were used regularly, and most acronyms (79%) appeared fewer than 10 times. Acronyms are not the biggest current problem in science communication, but reducing their use is a simple change that would help readers and potentially increase the value of science.
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Data source: Dataset, https://elifesciences.org/articles/60080
Access Status
Rights
© 2020, Barnett and Doubleday This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.