Surgeons’ affiliative responses to patients’ troubles-telling in outpatient consultations
Date
2019
Authors
Hender, Phoebe
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Thesis
Citation
Statement of Responsibility
Conference Name
Abstract
Empathy is recognized as an important way for medical professionals to demonstrate understanding of patients’ experiences and as such, is arguably a key aspect of patient satisfaction in the provision of healthcare. Existing research has examined affiliation as displays of understanding, compassion or agreement by physicians, enabling the integration of empathy in primary care and complementary health settings. Surgeon-patient interactions have received comparatively less analytic attention, prompting the current research on empathic communication in this context. The current study demonstrates the ways in which surgeons routinely responded to patients’ affective expressions of a trouble or problem in diagnostic consultations, through affiliative and non-affiliative displays. Conversation analysis was used to examine the integration or absence of this form of empathy in 75 surgeon-patient consultations, recorded in a metropolitan public hospital. The findings of this research suggest that patterns of surgeon-patient interaction are similar to those observed in general practice and homeopathy, with minimal and extended sequences identified, containing both affiliative and non-affiliative responses to patients’ troubles-telling. The nature and consequences of these responses are explored with consideration to the broader institutional aims of the consultation. Implications of these observations for patient-interaction are discussed in relation to professional training of empathic communication.
School/Discipline
School of Psychology
Dissertation Note
Thesis (B.PsychSc(Hons)) -- University of Adelaide, School of Psychology, 2019
Provenance
This electronic version is made publicly available by the University of Adelaide in accordance with its open access policy for student theses.
Copyright in this thesis remains with the author. This thesis may incorporate third party material which has been used by the author pursuant to Fair Dealing exceptions. If you are the author of this thesis and do not wish it to be made publicly available, or you are the owner of any included third party copyright material you wish to be removed from this electronic version, please complete the take down form located at: http://www.adelaide.edu.au/legals
Description
This item is only available electronically.