Current studentsExisting staffContact us
 

Catastrophic household costs due to injury in Vietnam

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, H.
dc.contributor.authorIvers, R.
dc.contributor.authorJan, S.
dc.contributor.authorMartiniuk, A.
dc.contributor.authorPham, C.
dc.date.issued2013
dc.description.abstractObjective: Little is known about the costs of injury and their impact on injured persons and their families in Vietnam. This study aimed to examine the cost of injury in hospitalised patients and to identify the most costly injuries and those more likely to result in catastrophic household expenditure. Method: A prospective cohort study was conducted, recruiting individuals admitted to Thai Binh General Hospital due to injury in Vietnam from January to August 2010. During the hospitalisation period, data on expenditure including direct medical, direct non-medical and indirect costs were collected. Demographic and injury characteristics were also obtained. The associations between the risk of catastrophic expenditure and injury cause, severity and principal injured region were examined by modified Poisson regression approach. Payment of more than 40% of the household non-subsistence spending was considered a catastrophic expenditure. Results: Of 918 patients approached, 892 (97%) were recruited. Total costs for all participants during the hospitalisation period were US$ 325,812. Patients admitted for road injury accounted for the largest number of injuries (n = 477, 53%), and the largest percentage of the total costs (US$ 175,044, 57%). This was followed by individuals hospitalised due to falls, representing 29% of the sample (n = 261) and 31% of the total costs (US$ 103,128). In terms of cost per hospital stay, burn injuries were the most costly (US$ 427), followed by falls (US$ 395) and road crashes (US$ 367). Of all sample, 26% experienced catastrophic expenditure due to their injuries. Factors significantly associated with increased risk of catastrophic expenditure were having more severe or higher MAIS injuries (RR = 2.02, 95% CI: 1.14-3.57), principal injured region to lower extremities (RR = 3.34, 95% CI: 1.41-7.91) or head (RR = 3.21, 95% CI: 1.37-7.52), longer hospital stay (RR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.07-1.10), older age, lower income and not having insurance (RR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.21-2.21). Conclusion: A high proportion of households experienced catastrophic expenditure following injury, highlighting the important need for programmes to prevent injuries, road traffic and fall-related injuries in particular. Furthermore, expansion of health insurance coverage may help individuals cope with the financial consequences of injury.
dc.identifier.citationInjury, 2013; 44(5):684-690
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.injury.2012.05.006
dc.identifier.issn0020-1383
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11541.2/120358
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.fundingAtlantic Philanthropies
dc.relation.fundingGeorge Institute for Global Health, University of Sydney
dc.relation.fundingNHMRC
dc.relation.fundingMerck Inc.
dc.rightsCopyright 2012 Elsevier
dc.source.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2012.05.006
dc.subjectcatastrophic expenditure
dc.subjectcost of hospitalisation
dc.subjectcost of injuries
dc.subjecteconomic burden
dc.subjectVietnam
dc.titleCatastrophic household costs due to injury in Vietnam
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.publication-statusPublished
ror.mmsid9916027083901831

Files

Collections