Current studentsExisting staffContact us
 

A collaborative experiential problem-solving approach to develop shams for complex physical interventions: a case study of dry needling

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorBraithwaite, F.A.
dc.contributor.authorWalters, J.L.
dc.contributor.authorMoseley, G.L.
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, M.T.
dc.contributor.authorMcEvoy, M.P.
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractObjective: Complex physical interventions are widely used in physiotherapy, despite doubts over the validity of clinical trial results due to lack of credible shams. Credible shams are critically needed, so too, therefore, is a process by which they can be developed. The authors used a novel methodology to develop and test blinding protocols for dry needling, a complex physical intervention for which blinding is particularly difficult. Design: The research design was a practical three-day workshop influenced by Participatory Action Research, which uses iteration and reflection to solve a problem. Participants: Five multidisciplinary experts (researchers, clinicians, technician, magician) were invited. Healthy volunteers (‘recipients’,n = 17) and accredited physiotherapists (n = 6) were recruited to enable testing of blinding strategies. Main outcome measures: Primary outcomes were expert opinion on the potential to blind recipients/therapists for (1) individual blinding strategies, and (2) entire blinding protocols. Secondary outcomes included recipient/therapist blinding effectiveness and acceptability. Results: Experts iteratively developed 11 blinding protocols involving 22 blinding strategies. Experts rated 18 of the blinding strategies to ‘definitely have potential’ and identified four categories: knowledge of the sham, clinical interaction, disinformation, and sensation. Recipient and therapist blinding became more successful as the protocols evolved. Conclusions: Credible shams capable of simultaneous recipient and therapist blinding have been regarded to be impossible in dry needling. The preliminary success of the devised protocols suggest that our novel approach may be a crucial step in sham development. Improvements in expert rankings and blinding effectiveness as the protocols progressed support the value of this workshop approach.
dc.identifier.citationPhysiotherapy, 2021; 113:177-187
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.physio.2021.08.004
dc.identifier.issn0031-9406
dc.identifier.issn1873-1465
dc.identifier.orcidWilliams, M.T. [0000-0002-0473-5157]
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11541.2/26638
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.rightsCopyright 2021 Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. Published by Elsevier Access Condition Notes: Accepted manuscript available after 1 October 2022
dc.source.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2021.08.004
dc.subjectclinical trials
dc.subjectworkshop
dc.subjectsham
dc.subjectplacebo
dc.subjectblinding
dc.subjectdry needling
dc.titleA collaborative experiential problem-solving approach to develop shams for complex physical interventions: a case study of dry needling
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.publication-statusPublished
ror.fileinfo12237715600001831 13237715590001831 9916570150601831_AM
ror.mmsid9916570150601831

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
9916570150601831_AM.pdf
Size:
394.42 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version
Download

Collections