Alternative Australian climate change plans : the public's views

dc.contributor.authorCarson, R.T.
dc.contributor.authorLouviere, J.J.
dc.contributor.authorWei, E.
dc.date.issued2010
dc.descriptionLink to a related website: http://www.econ.ucsd.edu/~rcarson/papers/JEPO3829.pdf, Open Access via Unpaywall
dc.description.abstractClimate change has come to the forefront of Australian politics and there is now an active on-going policy debate about how to best reach a commonly agreed long term goal. This paper looks at five major dimensions of this debate and constructs policy options based on them. A discrete choice experiment approach was used with a representative sample from a major internet panel provider. Survey respondents made choices between pairs of policy options with different characteristics. They favored policies starting in 2010 rather than 2012, and spending 20% of revenue raised on energy-related R&D. They were almost evenly split on whether the plan should initially exempt the transport sector and two competing approaches that redistribute revenue from the plan, and, they opposed plans giving special treatment to energy-intensive sectors of the economy. A number of other policy relevant questions related to understanding Australian views and knowledge related to climate change also were asked.
dc.identifier.citationEnergy Policy, 2010; 38(2):902-911
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.041
dc.identifier.issn0301-4215
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.8/155216
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.rightsCopyright 2009 Elsevier
dc.source.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.041
dc.subjectclimate policy
dc.subjectdiscrete choice modeling
dc.subjectpreference heterogeneity
dc.titleAlternative Australian climate change plans : the public's views
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.publication-statusPublished
ror.mmsid9915910471301831

Files

Collections