Controversies regarding cervical incompetence, short cervix, and the need for cerclage

dc.contributor.authorAlthuisius, S.
dc.contributor.authorDekker, G.
dc.date.issued2004
dc.descriptionCopyright © 2004 Elsevier Inc.
dc.description.abstractCervical incompetence (CI) is not an all or nothing phenomenon but a continuous variable. CI and preterm labor are not distinct entities but rather part of a spectrum leading to preterm delivery. Cervical length (CL) is an independent variable in the prediction of preterm delivery, to which it is inversely related. Application of a primary transvaginal cervical cerclage appears to be an unnecessary intervention in about 50% of women presenting with a history suggesting cervical incompetence. A better alternative for women with a history of or risk factors for CI is transvaginal ultrasonographic follow-up of CL. To facilitate the comparison of studies of CI, the authors suggest a nomenclature reflecting the different stages of prevention: primary, secondary, and tertiary transvaginal cervical cerclage.
dc.description.urihttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/623324/description#description
dc.identifier.citationClinics in Perinatology, 2004; 31(4):695-720
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.clp.2004.06.009
dc.identifier.issn0095-5108
dc.identifier.issn1557-9840
dc.identifier.orcidDekker, G. [0000-0002-7362-6683]
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/8108
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherW B Saunders Co
dc.source.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.clp.2004.06.009
dc.subjectCervix Uteri
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectUltrasonography, Prenatal
dc.subjectCerclage, Cervical
dc.subjectSuture Techniques
dc.subjectPregnancy
dc.subjectUterine Cervical Incompetence
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectObstetric Labor, Premature
dc.titleControversies regarding cervical incompetence, short cervix, and the need for cerclage
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.publication-statusPublished

Files