Barriers to increasing donor support: evidence on the incidence and nature of brand rejection

dc.contributor.authorFaulkner, M.
dc.contributor.authorTruong, O.
dc.contributor.authorRomaniuk, J.
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstractThis study examines individuals' refusal to support, or rejection, of charity brands. Drawing from an online survey of 490 Australian respondents, we find a low incidence of charity rejection. At brand level, the average rejection is 3%, with Greenpeace (19%) and World Vision (9%) showing the highest levels of rejection. The majority of respondents (71%) did not reject any of the 29 charity brands listed. The results show that for any specific charity, rejection is rare and that non-awareness levels are 14 times higher than rejection levels. This has important strategic implications for recruiting supporters, with non-awareness providing greater explanation of non-support than rejection. Charities should focus on raising knowledge and salience of the charity brand rather than trying to negate objections.
dc.identifier.citationNonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 2014; 44(5):1007-1025
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0899764014555985
dc.identifier.issn0899-7640
dc.identifier.issn1552-7395
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.8/160046
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSage Publications
dc.rightsCopyright 2014 Sage
dc.source.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/0899764014555985
dc.subjectbrand rejection
dc.subjectcharity support
dc.subjectnon-rejectors
dc.subjectrejectors
dc.titleBarriers to increasing donor support: evidence on the incidence and nature of brand rejection
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.publication-statusPublished
ror.fileinfo12142894410001831 13142957720001831 9915910040501831_53138097530001831.pdf
ror.mmsid9915910040501831

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
9915910040501831_53138097530001831.pdf
Size:
836.33 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version

Collections