Forecasting elections from voters' perceptions of candidates' ability to handle issues
Date
2013
Authors
Graefe, A.
Armstrong, S.
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Journal article
Citation
Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2013; 26(3):295-303
Statement of Responsibility
Conference Name
DOI
Abstract
When deciding for whom to vote, voters should select the candidate they expect to best handle issues, all other things equal. A simple heuristic predicted that the candidate who is rated more favorably on a larger number of issues would win the popular vote. This was correct for nine out of ten U.S. presidential elections from 1972 to 2008. We then used simple linear regression to relate the incumbent's relative issue ratings to the actual two-party popular vote shares. The resulting model yielded out-of-sample forecasts that were competitive with those from the Iowa Electronic Markets and established quantitative models. The issue-index model has implications for political decision makers, as it can help to track campaigns and to decide which issues to focus on
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Link to a related website: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/11729/1/MPRA_paper_11729.pdf, Open Access via Unpaywall
Access Status
Rights
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons