Does compulsory voting violate a right not to vote?

Files

RA_hdl_91928.pdf (338.58 KB)
  (Restricted Access)

Date

2015

Authors

Hill, L.

Editors

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Type:

Journal article

Citation

Australian Journal of Political Science, 2015; 50(1):61-72

Statement of Responsibility

Lisa Hill

Conference Name

Abstract

It is sometimes claimed that compulsory voting violates a particular right not to vote. For some, this assumed right is as fundamental as the right to vote. The existence of such a right, however, has attracted little sustained scholarly attention. This article explores from a political theory perspective whether the alleged ‘right not to vote’ is deserving the same legal and moral protection as the right to vote. I argue on two broad grounds that it is not. First, not all rights are capable of being legally waived and voting is one of them. Second, voting is a right but it is also a duty; it is a duty-right. Therefore, even though many people do fail to vote, doing so does not seem to constitute the exercise of any particular right, nor should it be legally recognised as such.

School/Discipline

Dissertation Note

Provenance

Description

Published online: 09 Jan 2015

Access Status

Rights

© 2015 Australian Political Studies Association

License

Grant ID

Call number

Persistent link to this record