Timing of anaphase-promoting complex activation in mouse oocytes is predicted by microtubule-kinetochore attachment but not by bivalent alignment or tension
dc.contributor.author | Lane, S.I.R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Yun, Y. | |
dc.contributor.author | Jones, K.T. | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.description.abstract | Homologous chromosome segregation errors during meiosis I are common and generate aneuploid embryos. Here, we provide a reason for this susceptibility to mis-segregation by live cell imaging of mouse oocytes. Our results show that stable kinetochore-microtubule attachments form in mid-prometaphase, 3-4 hours before anaphase. This coincided with the loss of Mad2 from kinetochores and with the start of anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C)-mediated cyclin B1 destruction. Therefore, the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) ceased to inhibit the APC/C from mid-prometaphase. This timing did not coincide with bivalent congression in one-third of all oocytes examined. Non-aligned bivalents were weakly positive for Mad2, under less tension than congressed bivalents and, by live-cell imaging, appeared to be in the process of establishing correct bi-orientation. The time from when the APC/C became active until anaphase onset was affected by the rate of loss of CDK1 activity, rather than by these non-aligned bivalents, which occasionally persisted until anaphase, resulting in homolog non-disjunction. We conclude that, in oocytes, a few erroneous attachments of bivalent kinetochores to microtubules do not generate a sufficient SAC 'wait anaphase' signal to inhibit the APC/C. | |
dc.description.statementofresponsibility | Simon I. R. Lane, Yan Yun and Keith T. Jones | |
dc.identifier.citation | Development, 2012; 139(11):1947-1955 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1242/dev.077040 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0950-1991 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1477-9129 | |
dc.identifier.orcid | Jones, K.T. [0000-0002-0294-0851] | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2440/117682 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Company of Biologists | |
dc.relation.grant | http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/569202 | |
dc.relation.grant | http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP120100946 | |
dc.rights | © 2012. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd. | |
dc.source.uri | https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.077040 | |
dc.subject | Cell cycle; oocyte; spindle assembly checkpoint; mouse | |
dc.title | Timing of anaphase-promoting complex activation in mouse oocytes is predicted by microtubule-kinetochore attachment but not by bivalent alignment or tension | |
dc.type | Journal article | |
pubs.publication-status | Published |