Phylogeny of Australasian venomous snakes (Colubroidea, Elapidae, Hydrophiinae) based on phenotypic and molecular evidence
Date
2004
Authors
Scanlon, J.
Lee, M.
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Journal article
Citation
Zoologica Scripta, 2004; 33(4):335-366
Statement of Responsibility
John D. Scanlon and Michael S. Y. Lee
Conference Name
Abstract
Phylogenetic relationships among Hydrophiinae (Australasian and marine elapid snakes) are inferred using 87 characters from external, skeletal, hemipenial and internal anatomy, ecology, and chromosomes as well as available sequences of two mitochondrial genes (cytochrome b and 16S rRNA). Parsimony analysis of the combined data retrieves many widely accepted clades; while observed bootstrap or branch (Bremer) support for these is often weak, most have never been corroborated previously by a rigorous numerical analysis. Sea kraits (Laticauda) and Solomon Islands elapids are basal to the remaining hydrophiines (Australian terrestrial forms and hydrophiin sea snakes). The latter clade includes three main lineages: a large-bodied oviparous lineage, a small-bodied oviparous lineage, and a viviparous lineage (which also includes the hydrophiin sea snakes, strongly reaffirmed as monophyletic). While the Solomons retain a relictual fauna, New Guinea has less endemism and has been invaded multiple times by Australian lineages, so there is no clear ‘stepping stone’ pattern supporting a northern (Asian, rather than Gondwanan) biogeographical origin.
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
The definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com