Current studentsExisting staffContact us
 

Consent during labour and birth as observed by midwifery students: a mixed methods study

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorLee, N.
dc.contributor.authorKearney, L.
dc.contributor.authorShipton, E.
dc.contributor.authorHawley, G.
dc.contributor.authorWinters Chang, P.
dc.contributor.authorKilgour, C.
dc.contributor.authorBrady, S.
dc.contributor.authorPeacock, A.
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, L.
dc.contributor.authorHumphrey, T.
dc.date.issued2023
dc.descriptionData source: Supplementary material, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2023.02.005
dc.description.abstractBackground: While consent is an integral part of respectful maternity care, how this is obtained during labour and birth presents conflicting understandings between midwives’ and women’s experiences. Midwifery students are well placed to observe interactions between women and midwives during the consent process. Aim: The purpose of this study was to explore the observations and experiences of final year midwifery students of how midwives obtain consent during labour and birth. Methods: An online survey was distributed via universities and social media to final year midwifery students across Australia. Likert scale questions based on the principles of informed consent (indications, outcomes, risks, alternatives, and voluntariness) were posed for intrapartum care in general and for specific clinical procedures. Students could also record verbal descriptions of their observations via the survey app. Recorded responses were analysed thematically. Findings: 225 students responded with 195 completed surveys; 20 students provided audio recorded data. Student’s observations suggested that the consent process varied considerably depending on the clinical procedure. Discussions of risks and alternatives during labour were frequently omitted. Discussion: The student’s accounts suggest that in many instances during labour and birth the principles of informed consent are not being applied consistently. Presenting interventions as routine care subverted choice for women in favour of the midwives’ preferences. Conclusions: Consent during labour and birth is invalidated by a lack of disclosure of risks and alternatives. Health and education institutions should include information in guidelines, theoretical and practice training on minimum consent standards for specific procedures inclusive of risks and alternatives.
dc.identifier.citationWomen and Birth, 2023; 36(6):574-581
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.wombi.2023.02.005
dc.identifier.issn1871-5192
dc.identifier.issn1878-1799
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11541.2/33246
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.rightsCopyright 2023 The author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Australian College of Midwives. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-NDlicense (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
dc.source.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2023.02.005
dc.subjectconsent
dc.subjectsurvey research
dc.subjectqualitative research
dc.subjectintrapartum
dc.titleConsent during labour and birth as observed by midwifery students: a mixed methods study
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.publication-statusPublished
ror.fileinfo12260429650001831 13278129600001831 Consent during labour and birth as observed by midwifery students_ A mixed methods study
ror.mmsid9916721810101831

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Consent during labour and birth as observed by midwifery students_ A mixed methods study.pdf
Size:
560.95 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version
Download

Collections