Balancing fairness to victims, society and defendants in the cross-examination of vulnerable witnesses: an impossible triangulation?
Date
2014
Authors
Bowden, P.
Henning, T.
Plater, D.
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Journal article
Citation
Melbourne University Law Review, 2014; 37(3):539-584
Statement of Responsibility
Phoebe Bowden, Terese Henning and David Plater
Conference Name
Abstract
Cross-examination is fundamental to the adversarial criminal trial. However, when children and witnesses with an intellectual disability are cross-examined, it can lead to unreliable evidence and further trauma to the victim. Various reforms in Australian jurisdictions, England and elsewhere have had only limited practical effect as they fail to address the underlying problems that arise from the adversarial system itself. While any changes must maintain a defendant’s vital right to a fair trial, the current criminal trial may allow defendants an illegitimate advantage. Fairness to the defendant, victim and society can and must be balanced. In order to reduce any illegitimate advantage, direct cross-examination should be removed. Instead, cross-examination should be conducted in advance of trial by a suitable third party and video-recorded. A similar process is used in Norway. A wholesale transformation into an inquisitorial system is not required for the benefits of non-adversarial examination to be achieved.
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Access Status
Rights
Copyright Status Unknown