A modest start, but a steady rise in research use: a longitudinal study of nurses during the first five years in professional life

Files

hdl_106073.pdf (700.47 KB)
  (Published version)

Date

2012

Authors

Wallin, L.
Gustavsson, P.
Ehrenberg, A.
Rudman, A.

Editors

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Type:

Journal article

Citation

Implementation Science, 2012; 7(1):19-1-19-12

Statement of Responsibility

Lars Wallin, Petter Gustavsson, Anna Ehrenberg and Ann Rudman

Conference Name

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Newly graduated nurses are faced with a challenging work environment that may impede their ability to provide evidence-based practice. However, little is known about the trajectory of registered nurses' use of research during the first years of professional life. Thus, the aim of the current study was to prospectively examine the extent of nurses' use of research during the first five years after undergraduate education and specifically assess changes over time. METHOD: Survey data from a prospective cohort of 1,501 Swedish newly graduated nurses within the national LANE study (Longitudinal Analyses of Nursing Education and Entry in Worklife) were used to investigate perceived use of research over the first five years as a nurse. The dependent variables consisted of three single items assessing instrumental, conceptual, and persuasive research use, where the nurses rated their use on a five-point scale, from 'never' (1) to 'on almost every shift' (5). These data were collected annually and analyzed both descriptively and by longitudinal growth curve analysis. RESULTS: Instrumental use of research was most frequently reported, closely followed by conceptual use, with persuasive use occurring to a considerably lower extent. The development over time showed a substantial general upward trend, which was most apparent for conceptual use, increasing from a mean of 2.6 at year one to 3.6 at year five (unstandardized slope +0.25). However, the descriptive findings indicated that the increase started only after the second year. Instrumental use had a year one mean of 2.8 and a year five mean of 3.5 (unstandardized slope +0.19), and persuasive use showed a year one mean of 1.7 and a year five mean of 2.0 (unstandardized slope +0.09). CONCLUSION: There was a clear trend of increasing research use by nurses during their first five years of practice. The level of the initial ratings also indicated the level of research use in subsequent years. However, it took more than two years of professional development before this increase 'kicked in.' These findings support previous research claiming that newly graduated nurses go through a 'transition shock,' reducing their ability to use research findings in clinical work.

School/Discipline

Dissertation Note

Provenance

Description

Access Status

Rights

© 2012 Wallin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons.

License

Grant ID

Call number

Persistent link to this record