When welfare-to-work programs seem to work well: explaining why Riverside and Portland shine so brightly

Date

2005

Authors

Greenberg, D.
Ashworth, K.
Cebulla, A.
Walker, R.

Editors

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Type:

Journal article

Citation

Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 2005; 59(1):34-50

Statement of Responsibility

David Greenberg, Karl Ashworth, Andreas Cebulla, And Robert Walker

Conference Name

Abstract

Of welfare-to-work programs evaluated by random assignment, two stand out as having exceptionally large estimated effects: one in Riverside, California, and the other in Portland, Oregon. The authors use data from 24 evaluations and the tools of meta-analysis to examine why. The findings indicate that the apparently superior performance of these two programs in increasing the earnings of participants is only partly attributable to program design (for example, the type of services provided, the use of sanctions, and the quality of program administration). Differences in caseload characteristics and site characteristics are probably more important. However, Riverside and Portland's relatively large effects in reducing the percentage of participants on the AFDC rolls appear mainly attributable to the design of the programs run in these sites.

School/Discipline

Dissertation Note

Provenance

Description

Access Status

Rights

© Cornell University

License

Grant ID

Call number

Persistent link to this record