Immediate judgment and non-cognitive ideas: The pervasive and persistent in the misreading of Kant’s Aesthetic formalism

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMcMahon, J.
dc.contributor.editorAltman, M.
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractKant’s aesthetic theory is misinterpreted when understood in terms of uncritical empiricism. By analyzing standard interpretations of Kant’s aesthetic formalism, McMahon argues that the meaning of direct/immediate and non-cognitive judgment is distorted when taken out of the context of Kant’s critical system of the mind. She concludes by drawing out the implications for understanding Kant’s aesthetic theory in the contemporary context.
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityJennifer A. McMahon
dc.identifier.citationThe Palgrave Kant Handbook, 2017 / Altman, M. (ed./s), Ch.19, pp.425-446
dc.identifier.doi10.1057/978-1-137-54656-2_19
dc.identifier.isbn1137546557
dc.identifier.isbn9781137546555
dc.identifier.orcidMcMahon, J. [0000-0002-2400-0166]
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/111191
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPalgrave Macmillan
dc.publisher.placeUK
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP150103143
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPalgrave Handbooks in German Idealism
dc.rightsThe Author(s) 2017
dc.source.urihttps://www.palgrave.com/de/book/9781137546555
dc.titleImmediate judgment and non-cognitive ideas: The pervasive and persistent in the misreading of Kant’s Aesthetic formalism
dc.typeBook chapter
pubs.publication-statusPublished

Files

Collections

Philosophy publications