Cost-effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment of early gestational diabetes mellitus: economic evaluation of the TOBOGM study, an international multicenter randomized controlled trial

Files

hdl_142196.pdf (395.86 KB)
  (Published version)

Date

2024

Authors

Haque, M.M.
Tannous, W.K.
Herman, W.H.
Immanuel, J.
Hague, W.M.
Teede, H.
Enticott, J.
Cheung, N.W.
Hibbert, E.
Nolan, C.J.

Editors

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Type:

Journal article

Citation

EClinicalMedicine, 2024; 71:102610-1-102610-11

Statement of Responsibility

Mohammad M. Haque, W. Kathy Tannous, William H. Herman, Jincy Immanuel, William M. Hague, Helena Teede, Joanne Enticott, N. Wah Cheung, Emily Hibbert, Christopher J. Nolan, Michael J. Peek, Vincent W. Wong, k Jeff R. Flack, Mark Mclean, Arianne Sweeting, Emily Gianatti, Alexandra Kautzky-Willer, Jürgen Harreiter, Viswanathan Mohan, Helena Backman, and David Simmons, on behalf of the TOBOGM Consortium.

Conference Name

Abstract

Background A recently undertaken multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) “Treatment Of BOoking Gestational diabetes Mellitus” (TOBOGM: 2017–2022) found that the diagnosis and treatment of pregnant women with early gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) improved pregnancy outcomes. Based on data from the trial, this study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment of early GDM (from <20 weeks’) among women with risk factors for hyperglycemia in pregnancy compared with usual care (no treatment until 24–28 weeks’) from a healthcare perspective. Methods Participants’ healthcare resource utilization data were collected from their self-reported questionnaires and hospital records, and valued using the unit costs obtained from standard Australian national sources. Costs were reported in US dollars ($) using the purchasing power parity (PPP) estimates to facilitate comparison of costs across countries. Intention-to-treat (ITT) principle was followed. Missing cost data were replaced using multiple imputations. Bootstrapping method was used to estimate the uncertainty around mean cost difference and costeffectiveness results. Bootstrapped cost–effect pairs were used to plot the cost-effectiveness (CE) plane and costeffectiveness acceptability curve (CEAC). Findings Diagnosis and treatment of early GDM was more effective and tended to be less costly, i.e., dominant (costsaving) [−5.6% composite adverse pregnancy outcome (95% CI: −10.1%, −1.2%), −$1373 (95% CI: −$3,749, $642)] compared with usual care. Our findings were confirmed by both the CE plane (88% of the bootstrapped cost–effect pairs fall in the south-west quadrant), and CEAC (the probability of the intervention being cost-effective ranged from 84% at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold value of $10,000–99% at a WTP threshold value of $100,000 per composite adverse pregnancy outcome prevented). Sub-group analyses demonstrated that diagnosis and treatment of early GDM among women in the higher glycemic range (fasting blood glucose 95–109 mg/dl [5.3–6.0 mmol/ L], 1-h blood glucose ≥191 mg/dl [10.6 mmol/L] and/or 2-h blood glucose 162–199 mg/dl [9.0–11.0 mmol/L]) was more effective and less costly (dominant) [−7.8% composite adverse pregnancy outcome (95% CI: −14.6%, −0.9%), −$2795 (95% CI: −$6,638, −$533)]; the intervention was more effective and tended to be less costly [−8.9% composite adverse pregnancy outcome (95% CI: −15.1%, −2.6%), −$5548 (95% CI: −$16,740, $1547)] among women diagnosed before 14 weeks’ gestation as well. Interpretation Our findings highlight the potential health and economic benefits from the diagnosis and treatment of early GDM among women with risk factors for hyperglycemia in pregnancy and supports its implementation. Longterm follow-up studies are recommended as a key future area of research to assess the potential long-term health benefits and economic consequences of the intervention.

School/Discipline

Dissertation Note

Provenance

Description

Access Status

Rights

© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

License

Call number

Persistent link to this record