Current studentsExisting staffContact us
 

Developing a Women's Thought Collective methodology for health research: The roles and responsibilities of researchers in the reflexive co-production of knowledge

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorFoley, K.
dc.contributor.authorLunnay, B.
dc.contributor.authorKevin, C.
dc.contributor.authorWard, P.R.
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractBackground: Co‐produced research holds enormous value within the health sciences. Yet, there can be a heavy focus on what research participants think, do and know; while the researcher's responsibility to explore and re/work their own knowledge or praxis tends to escape from view. This is reflected in the limited use of co‐production to explore broad structural distributions of health and risk(s). We argue this missed opportunity has the potential to unfold as what Berlant calls a ‘cruel optimism’, where something desirable becomes an obstacle to flourishing and/ or produces harm. We explore challenges to involving lay populations meaningfully in health research amidst a neoliberal cultural landscape that tends to responsibilise people with problems they cannot solve. Methods and Findings: Drawing together principles from hermeneutic and feminist philosophy, we develop a novel methodology for co‐producing research about determinants of health and health risk (using a case study of alcohol consumption as an example) that centres on what researchers do, know and think during research: Women's Thought Collectives. Discussion: Keeping the constructed nature of social systems—because they shape ideas of value, expertise and knowledge—in view during co‐produced research illuminates the potential for cruel optimisms within it. Such reflexive awareness carves out starting points for researchers to engage with how social hierarchies might (tacitly) operate during the co‐production of knowledge. Our work has broad utility for diverse population groups and provides important considerations around the roles and responsibilities for reflexive co‐production of knowledge at all levels of health systems. Patient or Public Contribution: The development of these ideas was sparked by working with lay participants during the Women's Thought Collectives for Kristen Foley's doctoral research 2021–2023, but undertaken without their direct involvement—in accordance with the responsibilities of researchers in the reflexive co‐production of knowledge. Forthcoming publications will address the outcomes and processes of this work.
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityKristen Foley, Belinda Lunnay, Catherine Kevin, Paul R. Ward
dc.identifier.citationHealth Expectations, 2023; 26(5):1954-1964
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/hex.13804
dc.identifier.issn1369-6513
dc.identifier.issn1369-7625
dc.identifier.orcidFoley, K. [0000-0002-8169-8652]
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2440/144195
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.grantNHMRC
dc.rights© 2023 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
dc.source.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13804
dc.subjectco‐production; feminism; hermeneutics; knowledge; reflexivity
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
dc.subject.meshResearch Personnel
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.titleDeveloping a Women's Thought Collective methodology for health research: The roles and responsibilities of researchers in the reflexive co-production of knowledge
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.publication-statusPublished

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
hdl_144195.pdf
Size:
675.46 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version
Download

Collections

Research Outputs