A comprehensive framework for standardising system boundary definition in life cycle energy assessments

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorOmrany, H.
dc.contributor.authorSoebarto, V.
dc.contributor.authorZuo, J.
dc.contributor.authorChang, R.
dc.contributor.editorBerardi, U.
dc.date.issued2021
dc.descriptionPublished: 28 May 2021
dc.description.abstractThis paper aims to propose a comprehensive framework for a clear description of system boundary conditions in life cycle energy assessment (LCEA) analysis in order to promote the incorporation of embodied energy impacts into building energy-efficiency regulations (BEERs). The proposed framework was developed based on an extensive review of 66 studies representing 243 case studies in over 15 countries. The framework consists of six distinctive dimensions, i.e., temporal, physical, methodological, hypothetical, spatial, and functional. These dimensions encapsulate 15 components collectively. The proposed framework possesses two key characteristics; first, its application facilitates defining the conditions of a system boundary within a transparent context. This consequently leads to increasing reliability of obtained LCEA results for decision-making purposes since any particular conditions (e.g., truncation or assumption) considered in establishing the boundaries of a system under study can be revealed. Second, the use of a framework can also provide a meaningful basis for cross comparing cases within a global context. This characteristic can further result in identifying best practices for the design of buildings with low life cycle energy use performance. Furthermore, this paper applies the proposed framework to analyse the LCEA performance of a case study in Adelaide, Australia. Thereafter, the framework is utilised to cross compare the achieved LCEA results with a case study retrieved from literature in order to demonstrate the framework’s capacity for cross comparison. The results indicate the capability of the framework for maintaining transparency in establishing a system boundary in an LCEA analysis, as well as a standardised basis for cross comparing cases. This study also offers recommendations for policy makers in the building sector to incorporate embodied energy into BEERs.
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityHossein Omrany, Veronica Soebarto, Jian Zuo and Ruidong Chang
dc.identifier.citationBuildings, 2021; 11(6):230-1-230-28
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/buildings11060230
dc.identifier.issn2075-5309
dc.identifier.issn2075-5309
dc.identifier.orcidOmrany, H. [0000-0002-4744-5088]
dc.identifier.orcidSoebarto, V. [0000-0003-1397-8414]
dc.identifier.orcidZuo, J. [0000-0002-8279-9666]
dc.identifier.orcidChang, R. [0000-0003-2223-5292]
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/131022
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.rightsCopyright: © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/).
dc.source.urihttps://www.mdpi.com/journal/buildings
dc.subjectembodied energy; operational energy; net-zero energy building; energy efficiency; conceptual framework
dc.titleA comprehensive framework for standardising system boundary definition in life cycle energy assessments
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.publication-statusPublished

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
hdl_131022.pdf
Size:
3.85 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version
Download

Collections

Architecture publications