Axonal Injury in falls
Date
1997
Authors
Abou-Hamden, A.
Blumbergs, P.
Scott, G.
Manavis, J.
Wainwright, H.
Jones, N.
McLean, J.
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Journal article
Citation
Journal of Neurotrauma, 1997; 14(10):699-713
Statement of Responsibility
Amal Abou-Hamden, Peter C. Blumbergs, Grace Scott, Jim Manavis, Helen Wainright, Nigel Jones and Jack Mclean
Conference Name
Abstract
Amyloid precursor protein (APP) immunocytochernistry was used as a marker for axonal injury (AI) in a series of 16 cases of head trauma associated with fatal falls. Nine cases were falls from not more than the person's own height (falls from 5 own height) and seven cases were falls from a distance greater than the person's own height (falls from > own height). A1 was recorded on a series of line diagrams of standard brain sections divided into 116 sectors. A1 around focal lesions (infarcts, hemorrhages, contusions) was distinguished from nonfocal axonal injury that was distant from any focal area of damage. The percentage of sectors showing focal A1 provided the Focal Axonal Injury Score (FAIS) and the percentage showing nonfocal A1 the Non-Focal Axonal Injury Score (NFAIS). The FAIS is a measure of secondary AI and the NFAIS of diffuse axonal injury (DAI). The percentage of sectors involved with A1 (focal and nonfocal) provided the cumulative Axonal Injury Score (AIS). A semiquantitative grading system was also used to assess the severity of axonal injury in each sector and the sum of the grades from all sectors was expressed as a percentage to provide the Axonal Injury Severity Score (AISS). Widespread A1 was present in all cases irrespective of the height of the fall. AI was present in the midbrain (94%), pons (94%), corpus callosurn (100%), central grey matter (100%), and cerebral hemispheric white matter (94%). AIS ranged from 10 to 94 in falls from 5 own height (mean 73) and from 38 to 92 in falls from > own height (mean 82). AISS ranged from 6 to 95 in falls from 5 own height (mean 65) and 28 to 95 in falls from > own height (mean 72). There was no statistically significant difference in AIS or AISS between the two groups. The extent and severity of A1 cannot be predicted from biomechanical data, such as the height of the fall, as the total A I in a given case is a variable mixture of Nunfocal A1 (DAI) and Focal A1 arising by secondary mechanisms, and APP immunostaining is unable to distinguish primary from secondary AL However, the combination of the Hypoxic-Ischemic Score (HIS) defined as the percentage of sectors showing any hypoxic-ischemic damage ranging from neuronal "red cell change" to infarction in conjunction with the FAIS and NFAIS provided a measure of the relative contribution of primary and secondary AI in a given brain.